←back to thread

ML needs a new programming language – Interview with Chris Lattner

(signalsandthreads.com)
311 points melodyogonna | 1 comments | 05 Sep 25 11:33 UTC | HN request time: 0.409s | source
Show context
tree_enjoyer ◴[05 Sep 25 20:45 UTC] No.45143384[source]▶
I know it's a bit of trope to say this on HN... but why not Lisp?

If I make the assumption that future ML code will be written by ML algorithms (or at least 'transpiled' from natural language), and Lisp S-Expressions are basically the AST, it would make sense that it would be the most natural language for a machine to write in. As a side benefit, it's already the standard to have a very feature complete REPL, so as a replacement for Python it seems it would fit well

replies(4): >>45143569 #>>45146098 #>>45146924 #>>45200305 #
1. pjmlp ◴[06 Sep 25 05:48 UTC] No.45146924[source]▶
Because it got burned in the last AI hype cycle, and many devs still think Emacs + SBCL is the only way, never even bothered to open the websites of LispWorks, Allegro Common Lisp or Clozure (not the JVM one).