←back to thread

Anthropic agrees to pay $1.5B to settle lawsuit with book authors

(www.nytimes.com)
989 points acomjean | 2 comments | 05 Sep 25 19:52 UTC | HN request time: 0.531s | source
Show context
aeon_ai ◴[05 Sep 25 20:46 UTC] No.45143392[source]▶
To be very clear on this point - this is not related to model training.

It’s important in the fair use assessment to understand that the training itself is fair use, but the pirating of the books is the issue at hand here, and is what Anthropic “whoopsied” into in acquiring the training data.

Buying used copies of books, scanning them, and training on it is fine.

Rainbows End was prescient in many ways.

replies(36): >>45143460 #>>45143461 #>>45143507 #>>45143513 #>>45143567 #>>45143731 #>>45143840 #>>45143861 #>>45144037 #>>45144244 #>>45144321 #>>45144837 #>>45144843 #>>45144845 #>>45144903 #>>45144951 #>>45145884 #>>45145907 #>>45146038 #>>45146135 #>>45146167 #>>45146218 #>>45146268 #>>45146425 #>>45146773 #>>45146935 #>>45147139 #>>45147257 #>>45147558 #>>45147682 #>>45148227 #>>45150324 #>>45150567 #>>45151562 #>>45151934 #>>45153210 #
1. caconym_ ◴[06 Sep 25 02:51 UTC] No.45146218[source]▶
> It’s important in the fair use assessment to understand that the training itself is fair use

IIUC this is very far from settled, at least in US law.

replies(1): >>45146579 #
2. doctorpangloss ◴[06 Sep 25 04:20 UTC] No.45146579[source]▶
Yes, but if you are predisposed for some reason to think that Anthropic "won" this case, then you're going to believe all sorts of things.