←back to thread

232 points ksajadi | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.6s | source
Show context
ninetyninenine ◴[] No.45141839[source]
I mean despite it's history the snark is well deserved. With so many companies and people in the bay paying taxes, where the hell does all the money go?

Interesting, tidbit you added here. But snark is needed for this situation.

replies(7): >>45142025 #>>45142027 #>>45142042 #>>45142069 #>>45142101 #>>45144445 #>>45147215 #
ants_everywhere ◴[] No.45144445[source]
It's hard to think of a single situation that's ever been improved by snark. Or passive aggressiveness in general.
replies(3): >>45144799 #>>45144876 #>>45145332 #
ninetyninenine ◴[] No.45145332[source]
It causes shame, and shame paves the way for change. I'm a bay area native, and I'm fucking ashamed of the pathetic excuse of public transportation called the bart. Absolute travesty.

Think in terms of evolution. If snark didn't convey any survival benefit, why tf does it exist?

replies(2): >>45145454 #>>45146414 #
nomel ◴[] No.45145454[source]
Seems like voting for someone else is the correct answer. If the uniparty that exists there today was in an away threatened, they might be motivated to competence. Complaining on HN won't motivate them. The snark is meant to be heard not just said to a void.
replies(1): >>45145613 #
ninetyninenine ◴[] No.45145613[source]
Voting hasn't done much good for this country. In fact voting is probably one of the most ineffective things for change in existence.

I'm not complaining to a void. All the readers of HN have heard me and other people complaining hear will be heard too. In aggregate many people complaining on many different venues creates an aggregate sentiment that hopefully will motivate the right people.

Cancel culture on social media has made big changes to this country and not everything necessarily good. But one thing is clear, it makes change effectively. Why not use it for the right thing?

Either way, I'm not complaining here because because I need some platform to say my piece. Bart IS categorically fucking garbage, that's less of a complaint and more of a statement. I'm just stating facts.

replies(2): >>45145735 #>>45146472 #
nomel ◴[] No.45145735[source]
> an aggregate sentiment that hopefully will motivate the right people.

I can't comprehend the thought that polluting this not-bay-area specific forum with complaints will somehow eventually, hopefully, make its way to a politician.

> because I need some platform to say my piece.

This is soap boxing. To affect change, it would be better to do something directly in the real world, rather than hoping for the snark to overflow and leak out of here into the real world.

replies(1): >>45146116 #
1. ninetyninenine ◴[] No.45146116[source]
>I'm not complaining here because because I need some platform to say my piece.

Dude, fuck off. The full quote which you've taken out of context is this: "I'm not complaining here because because I need some platform to say my piece."

I hate it when people twist statements. I literally said I am not doing that. I am just stating the god awful truth which is: Bart is total shit. But here's another truth: When you manipulate my statement and take it out of context it makes you a shit head too.

replies(1): >>45164830 #
2. nomel ◴[] No.45164830[source]
My bad, I misread. That wasn't intentional. I put very little effort into arguing with someone trying to make this place shittier.

But, your whole thing still fits the definition of soapboxing.

> To "soapbox" means to deliver a passionate or self-important public speech or express one's strong opinions, often on a topic one feels strongly about, originating from the literal practice of standing on an empty soapbox as an improvised platform to address a crowd. The term is frequently used figuratively to describe speaking forcefully or at length about a personal issue or belief.