←back to thread

334 points kickofline | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
apparent ◴[] No.45143208[source]
They say that you remember more when handwriting than when typing. I believe that. One thing I have wondered about is what if you write on a tablet and then it digitizes your handwriting. Do you still get the same benefit, from the process of having handwritten it?

I would think that part of the value would be in seeing the information written in your own handwriting, which makes me suspect that having a font like this that you could digitize into might be better than writing by hand (whic probably provides some of the memory boost) and then digitizing into a traditional font.

replies(4): >>45143253 #>>45143670 #>>45145199 #>>45145958 #
gxs ◴[] No.45145199[source]
This is not a humble brag by any means, just sharing my experience

I type 121 wpm and I simply can’t concentrate when writing by hand

It’s too slow and instead of focusing on formulating my thoughts or capturing what’s being said I get super fidgety

Not to mention my handwriting stinks

For me it’s a lot easier to remember when I’m fully immersed and processing ideas vs tediously writing

I do think this is probably just lack of handwriting skill - I definitely learned all this in school and took handwritten notes most of my life, but I suspect I never did it right back then

replies(4): >>45145843 #>>45146076 #>>45147278 #>>45148762 #
1. lostlogin ◴[] No.45146076[source]
> I type 121 wpm

Your comment had me wondering how quick various systems are for writing. Shorthand can apparently get comfortably over 200wpm, but the bit that is I found wild is is how it looks.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shorthand