←back to thread

989 points acomjean | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.221s | source
Show context
petralithic ◴[] No.45143482[source]
This is sad for open source AI, piracy for the purpose of model training should also be fair use because otherwise only the big companies who can afford to pay off publishers like Anthropic will be able to do so. There is no way to buy billions of books just for model training, it simply can't happen.
replies(9): >>45143523 #>>45143780 #>>45143876 #>>45144861 #>>45145004 #>>45145076 #>>45146993 #>>45147328 #>>45148584 #
dbalatero ◴[] No.45143523[source]
This implies training models is some sort of right.
replies(3): >>45143539 #>>45143739 #>>45147172 #
542458 ◴[] No.45143539[source]
No, it implies that having the power to train AI models exclusively consolidated into a handful of extremely powerful companies is bad.
replies(4): >>45144000 #>>45144660 #>>45144826 #>>45145555 #
johnnyanmac ◴[] No.45144660[source]
It implies that people want everyone to do this when it's clear no one should do it. I'm not exactly a fan of "this isn't profitable for small businesses to steal from so we should make it so everyone should steal".
replies(1): >>45144729 #
petralithic ◴[] No.45144729[source]
Piracy is not stealing. I don't know why everyone on HN suddenly turned into a copyright hawk, only big companies benefit from our current copyright regime, like Disney and their lobbying for increasing its length.
replies(4): >>45145085 #>>45145973 #>>45147026 #>>45147076 #
Aurornis ◴[] No.45145085[source]
> only big companies benefit from our current copyright regime

You’ve never authored, created, or published something? Never worked for a company that sells something protected by copyright?

replies(2): >>45145359 #>>45145414 #
1. okanat ◴[] No.45145414[source]
> Never worked for a company that sells something protected by copyright?

I.e. never created software in exchange of money.