←back to thread

989 points acomjean | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.265s | source
Show context
GodelNumbering ◴[] No.45143776[source]
Settlement Terms (from the case pdf)

1. A Settlement Fund of at least $1.5 Billion: Anthropic has agreed to pay a minimum of $1.5 billion into a non-reversionary fund for the class members. With an estimated 500,000 copyrighted works in the class, this would amount to an approximate gross payment of $3,000 per work. If the final list of works exceeds 500,000, Anthropic will add $3,000 for each additional work.

2. Destruction of Datasets: Anthropic has committed to destroying the datasets it acquired from LibGen and PiLiMi, subject to any legal preservation requirements.

3. Limited Release of Claims: The settlement releases Anthropic only from past claims of infringement related to the works on the official "Works List" up to August 25, 2025. It does not cover any potential future infringements or any claims, past or future, related to infringing outputs generated by Anthropic's AI models.

replies(6): >>45143823 #>>45143858 #>>45143877 #>>45144239 #>>45144802 #>>45146895 #
privatelypublic ◴[] No.45143823[source]
Don't forget: NO LEGAL PRECEDENT! which means, anybody suing has to start all over. You only settle in this scenario/point if you think you'll lose.

Edit: I'll get ratio'd for this- but its the exact same thing google did in it's lawsuit with Epic. They delayed while the public and courts focused in apple (oohh, EVIL apple)- apple lost, and google settled at a disadvantage before they had a legal judgment that couldn't be challenged latter.

replies(6): >>45143905 #>>45145075 #>>45145748 #>>45146369 #>>45148449 #>>45154425 #
1. daedrdev ◴[] No.45145075[source]
A full case is many more years of suits and appeals with high risks, so its natural to settle which obviously means no precedent