←back to thread

232 points ksajadi | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.483s | source
Show context
wills_forward ◴[] No.45140114[source]
The cheap easy take: it's tragically ironic that the software running the infrastructure in Silicon Valley is such a problem
replies(5): >>45140184 #>>45140677 #>>45140692 #>>45140964 #>>45145018 #
dilap ◴[] No.45140964[source]
It's a shame that SF politics are so dysfunctional it can't have a metro at the same level of quality as, say, North Korea.
replies(2): >>45141215 #>>45147247 #
coolspot ◴[] No.45141215[source]
North Korea? If you think it is a good example of a low bar of transit quality/safety to meet, then you’re comically far off.
replies(1): >>45142298 #
dilap ◴[] No.45142298[source]
You think that's setting the bar too high or too low?
replies(1): >>45145003 #
1. coolspot ◴[] No.45145003[source]
Too high. I think NK transit system is incomparably safer and cleaner than BART.

Riding without a ticket? Jail.

Littering on the platform? Straight to jail, right away!

Doing any violent crime in NK transit? Believe it or not - death by firing squad.

Here is a quick overview of how the system works: https://youtu.be/eiyfwZVAzGw?si=CnOMa8F6NkiyhifE

replies(1): >>45168904 #
2. dilap ◴[] No.45168904[source]
We're in agreement about the facts on the ground.

Setting aside safety for a moment, consider just hygiene: BART is shockingly dirty. Which suggests mismanagement, above and beyond just a lack of detterence of criminality.

As for safety -- firing squads are probably not in the cards, but would jailing the violent be too much to hope for?