←back to thread

280 points RyanShook | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.795s | source
Show context
0cf8612b2e1e ◴[] No.45144431[source]
To each their own, but the idea of an internet connected thermostat (at great expense!) never made sense to me. A $20 Honeywell lets you program 4 regions per day (waking, day, evening, night) and will be fine almost every day of the year. Has a battery backup and never failed me.

I guess it would be cute to get some analytics dashboard, but that’s about where my interest ends.

replies(8): >>45144467 #>>45144477 #>>45144490 #>>45144513 #>>45144540 #>>45144751 #>>45144821 #>>45144985 #
1. xyzelement ◴[] No.45144467[source]
The key usecases for me are:

Adjusting the thermostat (which is downstairs) from bed.

At the airport - oh shit did I turn off the AC for the two weeks we'll be away? Ok I just did.

replies(3): >>45144502 #>>45144518 #>>45144542 #
2. slipnslider ◴[] No.45144502[source]
Same. My Nest has probably paid for itself in terms of me being able to remotely disable it while away on trips
3. dogcow ◴[] No.45144518[source]
Luckily, this can all be achieved using a Wi-Fi or (even better) a Z-Wave thermostat that is 100% locally-controlled using something like Home Assistant or any number of other solutions.
replies(1): >>45144738 #
4. jkestner ◴[] No.45144542[source]
I got a Honeywell Sensi thermostat that can do that, and also works without an internet connection. Better things are possible.
5. xyzelement ◴[] No.45144738[source]
The guy I replied to was asking why you'd want an Internet connected thermostat.

I am a HA guy and prior to my ecobee I ran an American Radio Thermostat with local HA support and you could control over curl. But the wifi module was so old that no modern device connected to it when I had to reset it up.

But I agree zwave plus HA are a great option too.