←back to thread

989 points acomjean | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
rvz ◴[] No.45142879[source]
> A trial was scheduled to begin in December to determine how much Anthropic owed for the alleged piracy, with potential damages ranging into the hundreds of billions of dollars.

It has been admitted and Anthropic knew that this trial would totally bankrupt them had they said they were innocent and continued to fight the case.

But of course, there's too much money on the line, which means even though Anthropic settled (admitting guilt and profiting off of pirated books) they (Anthropic) knew there was no way they could win that case, and was not worth taking that risk.

> The pivotal fair-use question is still being debated in other AI copyright cases. Another San Francisco judge hearing a similar ongoing lawsuit against Meta ruled shortly after Alsup's decision that using copyrighted work without permission to train AI would be unlawful in "many circumstances."

The first of many.

replies(3): >>45143361 #>>45143415 #>>45145716 #
1. Robotbeat ◴[] No.45143361[source]
Wait, DID they admit guilt? A lot of times companies settle without admitting guilt.