←back to thread

I ditched Docker for Podman

(codesmash.dev)
1101 points codesmash | 1 comments | 05 Sep 25 11:56 UTC | HN request time: 0.622s | source
Show context
t43562 ◴[05 Sep 25 12:31 UTC] No.45137756[source]▶
To provide 1 contrary opinion to all the others saying they have a problem:

Podman rocks for me!

I find docker hard to use and full of pitfalls and podman isn't any worse. On the plus side, any company I work for doesn't have to worry about licences. Win win!

replies(7): >>45137807 #>>45137925 #>>45138918 #>>45140013 #>>45141773 #>>45142624 #>>45142950 #
Izmaki ◴[05 Sep 25 12:37 UTC] No.45137807[source]▶
None of your companies need to worry about licenses. Docker ENGINE is free and open source. Docker DESKTOP is a software suite that requires you to purchase a license to use in a company.

But Docker Engine, the core component which works on Linux, Mac and Windows through WSL2, that is completely and 1000% free to use.

replies(4): >>45137811 #>>45137833 #>>45137951 #>>45137973 #
xhrpost ◴[05 Sep 25 12:55 UTC] No.45137973[source]▶
From the official docs:

>This section describes how to install Docker Engine on Linux, also known as Docker CE. Docker Engine is also available for Windows, macOS, and Linux, through Docker Desktop.

https://docs.docker.com/engine/install/

I'm not an expert but everything I read online says that Docker runs on Linux so with Mac you need a virtual environment like Docker Desktop, Colima, or Podman to run it.

replies(2): >>45138007 #>>45138429 #
LelouBil ◴[05 Sep 25 12:58 UTC] No.45138007[source]▶
Docker desktop will run a virtual machine for you. But you can simply install docker engine in wsl or in a VM on mac exactly like you would on linux (you give up maybe automatic port forwarding from the VM to your host)
replies(2): >>45138166 #>>45139551 #
linuxftw ◴[05 Sep 25 13:14 UTC] No.45138166[source]▶
This. I run docker in WSL. I also do 100% of my development in WSL (for work, anyway). Windows is basically just my web browser.
replies(1): >>45138375 #
CuriouslyC ◴[05 Sep 25 13:34 UTC] No.45138375[source]▶
Ironic username. As a die hard, WSL aint bad though. I just can't deal with an OS that automatically quarantines bittorrent clients, decides to override local administrator policies via windows updates and pops up ad notifications.
replies(3): >>45138587 #>>45138644 #>>45142504 #
1. mmcnl ◴[05 Sep 25 19:18 UTC] No.45142504[source]▶
I personally use Windows + WSL2 and for work use macOS. I prefer Windows + WSL2 by a longshot. It just "works". macOS never "just works" for me. Colima is fine but requires a static memory allocation for the VM, it doesn't have the level of polish that WSL2 has. Brew is awful compared to apt (which you get with WSL2 because it's just Linux).

And then there's the windowing system of macOS that feels like it's straight from the 90s. "System tray" icons that accumulate over time and are distracting, awful window management with clunky animations, the near useless dock (clicking on VS Code shows all my 6 IDEs, why?). Windows and Linux are much modern in that regard.

The Mac hardware is amazing, well worth its price, but the OS feels like it's from a decade ago.