←back to thread

206 points arbayi | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.397s | source
Show context
andrewla ◴[] No.45141730[source]
Is anybody making smart glasses that are just a display? For me, the rest of the feature set verges on being anti-features. I'd much rather a very rudimentary display that my phone or another device could send relatively low bandwidth data to over bluetooth or some other protocol and build from there.

Having a camera or a mic on the glasses themselves seems like something I'd mostly want to avoid for privacy, and having a speaker just seems like gilding the lily when we already have a variety of headphones to choose from.

replies(15): >>45141760 #>>45141898 #>>45142046 #>>45142191 #>>45142200 #>>45142653 #>>45143450 #>>45143712 #>>45143765 #>>45144145 #>>45145287 #>>45146037 #>>45146638 #>>45147276 #>>45147350 #
HeatrayEnjoyer ◴[] No.45142046[source]
Glasses with a camera should be legislated away with specific narrow exceptions for e.g. safety in certain industrial tasks.
replies(2): >>45142106 #>>45145648 #
1. skhameneh ◴[] No.45142106[source]
Reframe this to accommodate for the prevalence and general expectations of where cameras exist.

Many people walk around with a mobile device out, essentially carrying a device with (increasingly) close to a 360 camera view. Cameras are ubiquitous and targeting one niche device is a waste of time and effort.

replies(1): >>45142331 #
2. esseph ◴[] No.45142331[source]
Sounds like a lobbyist pitch from Big Camera Glasses