←back to thread

398 points ChrisArchitect | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
isodev ◴[] No.45141438[source]
Oh nice. I hope other countries follow suit. It’s quite a shame Google didn’t get Chrome divested from them in the US, would’ve been a “nature is healing” moment for the web.
replies(4): >>45141476 #>>45141539 #>>45143526 #>>45145186 #
richwater ◴[] No.45141476[source]
Running a browser without an ecosystem behind it is a money pit and would be worth almost 0.
replies(3): >>45141494 #>>45141732 #>>45142090 #
isodev ◴[] No.45141494[source]
Doesn’t matter, as consumers, we’re absolutely ducked from all sides as long as our “window into the web” is fully controlled by a single corp.
replies(2): >>45141528 #>>45142038 #
1. jaredklewis ◴[] No.45142038[source]
Is it? I use Firefox. Can’t you just not use chrome, no legal interventions required?
replies(2): >>45143348 #>>45146353 #
2. fsflover ◴[] No.45143348[source]
Tell that to billions of normies who followed Google's (illegal) ads of Chrome.
3. blackqueeriroh ◴[] No.45146353[source]
Firefox is only financially sustainable because of the massive payments Google makes to Mozilla to set Google as the default search service.