←back to thread

232 points ksajadi | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.325s | source
Show context
bigmattystyles ◴[] No.45140579[source]
Broke the read-only Friday rule…
replies(2): >>45140943 #>>45141386 #
jkingsman ◴[] No.45140943[source]
I know this is a tongue in cheek casual comment, but this article is a really good and important counterpoint: https://charity.wtf/2019/05/01/friday-deploy-freezes-are-exa...
replies(10): >>45140998 #>>45141312 #>>45141402 #>>45141439 #>>45141454 #>>45141628 #>>45141856 #>>45142250 #>>45142827 #>>45147202 #
dogleash ◴[] No.45141454[source]
I hate how people hear "read only friday" and decide to turn it into a CI/CD dick measuring contest.

For "read only friday" to have been a novel idea in the first place, you needed a starting point where conventional practice already was making changes live without stopping to consider the time/day of week.

I really suspect the detractors represent a workflow that would break (or at least introduce pain) if unable to push to production for a few days. So they have to give the hard sell on the benefits of continuous deployment.

replies(1): >>45141667 #
1. ◴[] No.45141667[source]