←back to thread

Age Simulation Suit

(www.age-simulation-suit.com)
206 points throwup238 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nate ◴[] No.45130461[source]
My dad is 85 and this article hits hard about what he fights going on in his body. What sucks is how much of a downward, self reinforcing spiral it all is. It's so hard to see the curbs to walk over or how to get to a thing himself, so he just naturally chooses to do fewer and fewer things. Watching TV is safer and kinder and becomes the default to anything. Which just makes his brain less and less stimulated and active, and you can imagine the drag that adds to keep figuring out life.

But like the empathy found in this article, it's caused me to be incredibly more patient with anyone struggling to walk in front of me on a crowded or narrow sidewalk.

Aging is rough. Thank you to everyone working on accessibility and aging related tech and science.

replies(7): >>45130648 #>>45130797 #>>45132303 #>>45132374 #>>45132577 #>>45134344 #>>45135119 #
ACCount37 ◴[] No.45132577[source]
Aging should be recognized as a disease already. It's long overdue.
replies(2): >>45132762 #>>45135405 #
1718627440 ◴[] No.45132762[source]
Disease is abnormal to some "norm". When everyone has it, it's not a disease.
replies(1): >>45132846 #
ACCount37 ◴[] No.45132846[source]
I would appreciate if the "norm" was recognized to be not having your body rot away over time.

It really is simple: aging is incredibly harmful and undesirable. It strips away your quality of life until there isn't much left and then you die. It doesn't take any more than that for it to be declared a disease.

Whether it's "natural" or whether "everyone has it" is a distraction. If everyone was born with cancer, that wouldn't make cancer any less of a disease.

replies(3): >>45132901 #>>45133503 #>>45133512 #
kulahan ◴[] No.45133503[source]
I wouldn’t call one of the most essential parts of the life process (moving towards the end of your life involuntarily) a disease.

It’s actually very disturbing how people seem not to be worried about the growing potential for immortality. THAT is a disease, if anything.

replies(1): >>45133561 #
ACCount37 ◴[] No.45133561[source]
If you want to decay and rot and die a miserable death, that's your choice. If your genuine preference is that all of your friends and family and your own children should decay and rot and die a miserable death too, then that's your opinion and you can hold onto it.

But don't you dare force that outcome onto everyone.

In my eyes, "decay and rot and the inevitability of a miserable death is a good thing actually" is a fucking insane viewpoint to hold. The only possible reason I see to hold onto it is that it's the socially accepted cope. If you truly believe that nothing can be done about aging, then "death is good acktually" makes for a good coping mechanism.

I'd rather humans cope less and problem-solve more.

replies(3): >>45133617 #>>45133649 #>>45133841 #
kulahan ◴[] No.45133649[source]
If you want the world to be run by a 700 year old Xi jinping, if you want your children to suffer under a thousand year rule of monopolistic Bezos, if you want to see Altered Carbon become a reality, then that’s your opinion and you can hold on to it.

But don’t you dare force that on anyone else.

See how unconvincing these platitudes are?

I literally cannot imagine why you would want infinite life. The short timespan is 99% of the reason life is so valuable. We need to do what we can with the time we’re given.

I never said nothing could be done about aging anyways. I think we’ll reach the point where people only die when they choose to.

That’s also a pure dystopia, because it’s beyond naive to think this would be some commonplace technology afforded to everyone and not just the ruling class.

Imagine if King George were still ruling England. No rules can change ever - he’s the king. Hope you like eternal monarchy.

I sometimes wonder if people are so afraid of death because they never talk about it frankly? My wife and I converse about it regularly.

replies(2): >>45133854 #>>45136292 #
viking123 ◴[] No.45136292[source]
I kind of agree but on the other hand I think it would also change the calculus a lot, if the dictator was going to live to 700, wouldn't it be more likely for someone to act and try to get him out because now the calculus might be that it's just better to wait it out than try to set anything up?

It's a bit hard to visualize that kind of world because so many other things would also be different, and if the politicians were chronologically like 500, they would biologically be still much younger so maybe the mind would allow for much more plasticisty and that would allow them to be more open to new ideas.

replies(1): >>45139355 #
bigyabai ◴[] No.45139355[source]
Now this is some of that top-shelf cope I've heard about.
replies(1): >>45140777 #
1. viking123 ◴[] No.45140777[source]
Less than the cope in this thread though. MUH NATURE, MUH WISDOM, MUH 8000 YEAR OLD PUTIN. Have you thought about the 5000 year old Kim Jong Un yet?
replies(1): >>45147014 #
2. bigyabai ◴[] No.45147014[source]
Conscious senescence makes up less than 0.01% of my self-aware life.