←back to thread

1101 points codesmash | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
1. rweichler ◴[] No.45139352[source]
On the topic of ditching Docker, has anyone else created a custom test harness with QEMU? I feel like I'm the only person doing it this way. QEMU's target userbase is emulators in general, which is a much broader audience with way more development effort going into it, therefore I don't think it can ever go "out of fashion" or get hijacked by perverse corporate interests like Docker can. Podman seems to have the same vulnerability.
replies(1): >>45139371 #
2. drzaiusx11 ◴[] No.45139371[source]
This is what Lima is, which is the basis for Colima which runs on top with all the Docker runtime stuff

https://github.com/lima-vm/lima

https://github.com/abiosoft/colima

replies(1): >>45140003 #
3. rweichler ◴[] No.45140003[source]
Interesting, thanks. Looks much better than Docker/Podman. But seems to suffer from the same incentive issue. I think I'll stick with my raw QEMU setup, Lima seems like QEMU + batteries, but I already built the batteries.
replies(1): >>45141660 #
4. drzaiusx11 ◴[] No.45141660{3}[source]
Fun fact podman desktop is just a front end to Lima, or was last I checked
replies(1): >>45142609 #
5. rweichler ◴[] No.45142609{4}[source]
Yeah, seems like the power law is at play here. I made my test harness in 2020 so I didn't have a choice as Lima didn't exist back then. I should have waited a year. I'll certainly keep an eye on it