←back to thread

250 points pabs3 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
tombert ◴[] No.45123598[source]
I have never played with GNUStep. By the time I actually started real work as a professional software person (2011) it was already kind of considered a joke, so I never bothered learning how to use it.

It bothers me a bit, though. Developing for desktop Linux is still a pain in the ass, and I really wish the Linux community had agreed on One Desktop Framework To Rule Them All, and I think GNUStep could have been that framework if the community had been willing to embrace it.

replies(6): >>45123922 #>>45123951 #>>45124102 #>>45124494 #>>45125904 #>>45127032 #
phendrenad2 ◴[] No.45125904[source]
I think that most active, current Linux users see fragmentation as a good thing, because they absolutely don't want consolidation of power. Many will point to a time when GNOME reigned supreme, and how did they use that power? To repeatedly completely redesign the GUI in ways that the community hated, because "we know better".

There is a much larger group of people who would support "One Desktop Framework To Rule Them All", but they aren't as loud, so they don't get heard.

replies(1): >>45126668 #
tombert ◴[] No.45126668[source]
Wait, did Gnome ever reign supreme? I feel like there was always a back and forth with Gnome and KDE?
replies(2): >>45127316 #>>45139217 #
1. p_l ◴[] No.45139217[source]
Never fully, but it's how we got systemd nearly everywhere - GNOME 3.8 arrived with support for polkit-based approach for, among other things, power management, and mandated logind. Which at the time was very much a banana that required the gorilla and the whole jungle to run. Some tried to deal with it, some managed to even separate udev and logind out, but the immediate effect was that distributions that avoided systemd or made it optional - including ones that were exploring alternative paths, were forced to adopt systemd or remove support for GNOME 3.8 and newer.