←back to thread

286 points saikatsg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ktosobcy ◴[] No.45137736[source]
EU should to the same (FB & X).

In general anything that has "algorytmic content ordering" that pushes content triggering strong emotional reactions should be banned and burned to the ground.

replies(16): >>45137822 #>>45138118 #>>45138157 #>>45138164 #>>45138363 #>>45138553 #>>45138596 #>>45138634 #>>45138850 #>>45139915 #>>45141003 #>>45141109 #>>45141695 #>>45141755 #>>45143915 #>>45147812 #
wmeredith ◴[] No.45138634[source]
I saw a really good analogy the other day (on X, natch) that said subscribing to modern social media is like inviting a clown to come in your house every 10 minutes and scream, "It's gotten worse". I think about that a lot. Curation goes a long way, but it takes work.
replies(5): >>45139109 #>>45139153 #>>45139692 #>>45140015 #>>45144032 #
mrcwinn ◴[] No.45139109[source]
Not to the same degree, but I'd argue HN has the same tendencies. Cynical, skeptical, assuming the worst intentions, a bogeyman tech giant hoping to destroy its own customers. Skepticism is, of course, healthy, but the default behavior in this community completely misses the reality that had we frozen progress, say, right near the Apple II launch, we never get HackerNews itself. :)

And if you accept my premise, it's probably not the websites, but rather the humans themselves.

replies(2): >>45139134 #>>45144064 #
1. hshshshshsh ◴[] No.45139134[source]
Have you worked in a fortune 500?