(signalsandthreads.com)

311 points melodyogonna | 2 comments | 05 Sep 25 11:33 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source

Show context

nromiun ◴[05 Sep 25 12:59 UTC] No.45138008[source]▶

Weird that there has been no significant adoption of Mojo. It has been quite some time since it got released and everyone is still using PyTorch. Maybe the license issue is a much bigger deal than people realize.

replies(10): >>45138022 #>>45138094 #>>45138140 #>>45138494 #>>45138853 #>>45138904 #>>45141581 #>>45141912 #>>45142155 #>>45144921 #

1. singularity2001 ◴[05 Sep 25 14:14 UTC] No.45138853[source]▶

>>45138008 #

Is it really released? Last time I checked it was not open sourced I don't want to rely on some proprietary vaporware stack.

replies(1): >>45139218 #

2. melodyogonna ◴[05 Sep 25 14:47 UTC] No.45139218[source]▶

>>45138853 (TP) #

It is released but not open-source. Modular was aiming to open-source the compiler by Q4 2026; however, Chris now says they could be able to do that considerably faster, perhaps early 2026[1].

If you're interested, they think the language will be ready for open source after completing phase 1 of the roadmap[2].

1.https://youtu.be/I0_XvXXlG5w?si=KlHAGsFl5y1yhXnm&t=943

2. https://docs.modular.com/mojo/roadmap

↑

ML needs a new programming language – Interview with Chris Lattner