←back to thread

Development speed is not a bottleneck

(pawelbrodzinski.substack.com)
191 points flail | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
1. BiteCode_dev ◴[] No.45138849[source]
Even if it were not a bottleneck, speed allow use cases you wouldn't consider before.

I use Python differently because uv made many things faster, less costly. Stuff I used to do in bash are now in Python. Stuff I wouldn't do at all because 3rd party modules were an incompressible expense, now I do because the cost is low.

Same with AI.

Every week, there was a small tool I actively chose to not develop because I know that it would save less time by automating the thing than it would take coding it.

E.G: I send regularly documents from my hard drive or forward mails to a specific email for accounting. It would be nice to be able to do those in one click. But dev a nautilus script or thunderbird extension to save max a minute a day doesn't make sense.

Except now with claude code, it does. In a week, they paid off. And now I'm racking the minutes.

Now each week, I'm getting a new tool that is not only saving me minutes, but also reducing context switching. Those turn into hours, which turn into days. These compounds.

And of course, getting out a MVP, or a new feature demo out of the door quickly allows you to get feedback faster.

In general, AI lets you get a shorter feedback loop. Trash bad concept sooner. Get crucial info faster.

Those do speed up a project.