←back to thread

ML needs a new programming language – Interview with Chris Lattner

(signalsandthreads.com)
311 points melodyogonna | 1 comments | 05 Sep 25 11:33 UTC | HN request time: 0.333s | source
Show context
nromiun ◴[05 Sep 25 12:59 UTC] No.45138008[source]▶
Weird that there has been no significant adoption of Mojo. It has been quite some time since it got released and everyone is still using PyTorch. Maybe the license issue is a much bigger deal than people realize.
replies(10): >>45138022 #>>45138094 #>>45138140 #>>45138494 #>>45138853 #>>45138904 #>>45141581 #>>45141912 #>>45142155 #>>45144921 #
jb1991 ◴[05 Sep 25 13:00 UTC] No.45138022[source]▶
It says at the top:

> write state of the art kernels

Mojo seems to be competing with C++ for writing kernels. PyTorch and Julia are high-level languages where you don't write the kernels.

replies(3): >>45138088 #>>45138136 #>>45138151 #
1. jakobnissen ◴[05 Sep 25 13:11 UTC] No.45138136[source]▶
I think Julia aspires to be performant enough that you can write the kernels in Julia, so Julia is more like Mojo + Python together.

Although I have my doubts that Julia is actually willing to make the compromises which would allow Julia to go that low level. I.e. semantic guarantees about allocations and inference, guarantees about certain optimizations, and more.