←back to thread

ML needs a new programming language – Interview with Chris Lattner

(signalsandthreads.com)
311 points melodyogonna | 1 comments | 05 Sep 25 11:33 UTC | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
nromiun ◴[05 Sep 25 12:59 UTC] No.45138008[source]▶
Weird that there has been no significant adoption of Mojo. It has been quite some time since it got released and everyone is still using PyTorch. Maybe the license issue is a much bigger deal than people realize.
replies(10): >>45138022 #>>45138094 #>>45138140 #>>45138494 #>>45138853 #>>45138904 #>>45141581 #>>45141912 #>>45142155 #>>45144921 #
1. fnands ◴[05 Sep 25 13:07 UTC] No.45138094[source]▶
It's still very much in a beta stage, so a little bit hard to use yet.

Mojo is effectively an internal tool that Modular have released publicly.

I'd be surprised to see any serious adoption until a 1.0 state is reached.

But as the other commented said, it's not really competing with PyTorch, it's competing with CUDA.