←back to thread

Nepal moves to block Facebook, X, YouTube and others

(www.aljazeera.com)
286 points saikatsg | 6 comments | 05 Sep 25 11:31 UTC | HN request time: 0.216s | source | bottom
Show context
ktosobcy ◴[05 Sep 25 12:29 UTC] No.45137736[source]▶
EU should to the same (FB & X).

In general anything that has "algorytmic content ordering" that pushes content triggering strong emotional reactions should be banned and burned to the ground.

replies(16): >>45137822 #>>45138118 #>>45138157 #>>45138164 #>>45138363 #>>45138553 #>>45138596 #>>45138634 #>>45138850 #>>45139915 #>>45141003 #>>45141109 #>>45141695 #>>45141755 #>>45143915 #>>45147812 #
thinkingtoilet ◴[05 Sep 25 12:39 UTC] No.45137822[source]▶
It's such an obvious poison. Social media is responsible for the destruction of civility on so many levels. It has destroyed a generations attention span. It is a drug that is more powerful and addictive than something like weed. It seems like people here are too young to remember a life before it. It has transformed society negatively in just a decade. It absolutely should go. I'm glad you did something positive on it. Or found a community. You can still do that without social media. It needs to go.
replies(3): >>45138000 #>>45138421 #>>45148447 #
1. ktosobcy ◴[05 Sep 25 12:58 UTC] No.45138000[source]▶
IMHO there were better communities on old forums...
replies(1): >>45138338 #
2. thinkingtoilet ◴[05 Sep 25 13:29 UTC] No.45138338[source]▶
And it was contained. If you have a small group, you can manage an asshole or two, sometimes it can even be endearing ("he's an asshole, but he's our asshole"). Once the numbers start going up the toxicity increases by orders of magnitude. It's impossible to moderate. The benefits nearly all fall away and the negatives are amplified. Add on the smartest people in the world working very hard to get everyone, including children, addicted to social media and it's fucking nefarious.
replies(2): >>45138564 #>>45139176 #
3. threetonesun ◴[05 Sep 25 13:49 UTC] No.45138564[source]▶
Ah, this reminds me of the one asshole on the old car forum I used to heavily participate in, who would tell new users how dumb all their ideas were for modifying their cars were. And yes, some would argue back, and then someone else would step in and point out all the threads from the cranky asshole where he'd already tried everything they were suggesting.
4. diggan ◴[05 Sep 25 14:43 UTC] No.45139176[source]▶
> Once the numbers start going up the toxicity increases by orders of magnitude. It's impossible to moderate.

As someone who spent an embarrassingly long time on what lots of people claim to be the most toxic forum in the world (not sure about that, it's the biggest in the Nordics though, that's for sure), and even moderated some categories on that forum that many people wouldn't touch with a ten-foot pole, it really isn't that hard to moderate even when the topics are sensitive and most users are assholes.

I'd argue that moderation is difficult today on lots of platforms because it's happening too much "on the fly" so you end up with moderators working with the rules differently and applying them differently, depending on mood/topic/whatever.

If you instead make a hard list of explicit rules, with examples, and also establish internal precedents that moderators can follow, a lot of the hard work around moderation basically disappears, regardless of how divisive the topic is. But it's hard and time-consuming work, and requires careful deliberation and transparent ruling.

replies(1): >>45140725 #
5. __s ◴[05 Sep 25 16:52 UTC] No.45140725{3}[source]▶
I think part of that was volunteer moderation. Were you paid to moderate those boards? Most moderation was a form of community involvement

Recent social media (& maybe "recent" no longer applies) doesn't have this kind of community run tooling

replies(1): >>45142203 #
6. diggan ◴[05 Sep 25 18:51 UTC] No.45142203{4}[source]▶
> Were you paid to moderate those boards?

No, none of the moderators were paid, but I do think the ~2/3 admins were paid. But yeah, I did it purely out of the want for the forum to remain high-quality, as did most of the other moderators AFAIK.

> Recent social media (& maybe "recent" no longer applies) doesn't have this kind of community run tooling

Agree, although reddit with its "every subreddit is basically its own forum but not really" (admins still delete stuff you wouldn't + vice-versa) kind of did an extreme version of community run tooling, with the obvious end result that moderation is super unequal across reddit, and opaque.

Bluesky is worth mentioning as well, with their self-proclaimed "stackable" moderation, which is kind of some fresh air in the space. https://bsky.social/about/blog/03-12-2024-stackable-moderati...