(signalsandthreads.com)

311 points melodyogonna | 2 comments | 05 Sep 25 11:33 UTC | HN request time: 0.416s | source

Show context

Cynddl ◴[05 Sep 25 12:46 UTC] No.45137883[source]▶

Anyone knows what Mojo is doing that Julia cannot do? I appreciate that Julia is currently limited by its ecosystem (although it does interface nicely with Python), but I don't see how Mojo is any better then.

replies(8): >>45137977 #>>45137999 #>>45138029 #>>45138039 #>>45138393 #>>45138420 #>>45138513 #>>45143187 #

1. jakobnissen ◴[05 Sep 25 12:55 UTC] No.45137977[source]▶

>>45137883 #

Mojo to me looks significantly lower level, with a much higher degree of control.

Also, it appears to be more robust. Julia is notoriously fickle in both semantics and performance, making it unsuitable for foundational software the way Mojo strives for.

replies(1): >>45143011 #

2. Archit3ch ◴[05 Sep 25 20:06 UTC] No.45143011[source]▶

>>45137977 (TP) #

> Also, it appears to be more robust.

Sure, Mojo the language is more robust. Until its investors decide to 10x the licensing Danegeld.

↑

ML needs a new programming language – Interview with Chris Lattner