←back to thread

A high schooler writes about AI tools in the classroom

(www.theatlantic.com)
222 points dougb5 | 1 comments | 04 Sep 25 02:37 UTC | HN request time: 0.241s | source
Show context
AIorNot ◴[04 Sep 25 05:06 UTC] No.45123774[source]▶
I’m an AI engineer but I think schools need a nuclear option

Banish tech in schools (including cell phones) (except during comp classes) but allow it at home

Ie in high school only allow paper and pencil/pen

Go back to written exams (handwriting based)

Be lenient on spelling and grammer

Allow homework, digital tutoring AI assistants and AI only when it not primary- ie for homework not in class work

Bring back oral exams (in a limited way)

Encourage study groups in school but don’t allow digital tech in those groups in class or libraries only outside of campus or in computer labs

Give up iPads and Chromebooks and Pearson etc

replies(9): >>45123834 #>>45123891 #>>45126033 #>>45126590 #>>45129146 #>>45131833 #>>45132364 #>>45135094 #>>45137686 #
1. cauliflower99 ◴[05 Sep 25 12:21 UTC] No.45137686[source]▶
From a teacher's perspective, I'm sure the craft is a mess of bad school policies vs. so-called "best practices" vs. real learning science vs. government policies vs. ancient bad advice (eg. learning styles and tablets in classrooms) vs. personal opinion.

It's not like there is a senior engineer who's got mountains of expertise to defer to (like a software team would have). Teachers are likely given directives from their schools and get dumped a bunch of tablets and are told this is "modern" education and to just roll it out.

Anyway, to your point - top-down directives are what change schools. There has been success such as banning smartphones in Ireland & UK recently. Schools taking on the problems and then solving it themselves could go a long way, rather than waiting for government to mandate things.