←back to thread

520 points kevinyew | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.283s | source
Show context
crowcroft ◴[] No.45128398[source]
The strategic insight behind Arc was perfect – your browser IS the Operating System, and so we should build a browser that can function as that platform.

Arc had pretty good market validation with early adopters, they say that growth was flattened out but IMO that's normal for most products, and it's up to the company to find out WHY growth flattened and then solve that problem. Not kill the product and chase some entirely new idea about AI.

I wouldn't be surprised if the investors were fed up with the business and wanted out, pretty good exit all things considered.

replies(10): >>45128530 #>>45128798 #>>45128955 #>>45129016 #>>45129916 #>>45131541 #>>45131834 #>>45132803 #>>45133258 #>>45135253 #
mattlutze ◴[] No.45131834[source]
I'm a little surprised how many Chromium browser builders we have in the market, and how each continues to convince a group of investors that _they_ are going to be the ones to finally get it right, while still building on Chrome's skeleton.

But, there's a bunch on WebKit and Gecko as well.

replies(1): >>45131884 #
crowcroft ◴[] No.45131884[source]
On the other hand, it's kind of crazy no one can make an OS except Windows, Apple and Google? Trillion dollar market and no one can compete.
replies(10): >>45131908 #>>45131909 #>>45131934 #>>45131991 #>>45132071 #>>45132763 #>>45133637 #>>45134028 #>>45134192 #>>45137633 #
1. xboxnolifes ◴[] No.45137633[source]
If you mean a paid, consumer OS, you've got to keep in mind that they're essentially tied to a hardware product. The vast majority of your target market is not installing an alternative OS manually. You would need to either sell hardware with your OS or get hardware companies to package your OS over the existing options.

With how mature the personal computer market is, this is a very big hurdle.