←back to thread

222 points dougb5 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.417s | source
Show context
azangru ◴[] No.45137171[source]
In the novel Tom Brown's School Days [0], published in mid 19-th century and depicting a public school in the first quarter of that century, there is a scene describing how students those days used "vulgus-books": collections of previous years' students' homeworks in Latin that new students copied from for their assignments in Latin composition. There was a boy named Arthur in that story who refused to copy from other students' essays, and worked on the compositions himself. He also tried to convince his friends to abandon that practice of copying, and to write their assignments on their own.

This is what this article reminded me of. The student writes how her classmates use help from AI as if she cannot decide for herself to do the work on her own if she cares about learning. She writes as if she is devoid of agency.

The Atlantic published a post on reddit about this article, titled "I’m a High Schooler. AI Is Demolishing My Education." [1] And yet, it is the other students that the author primarily focuses on. Why does other students' cheating demolish _her_ education?

[0] - https://gutenberg.org/cache/epub/1480/pg1480.txt

[1] - https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/1n7o...

replies(2): >>45137268 #>>45137336 #
1. dsr_ ◴[] No.45137336[source]
If you don't have anyone around who understands the material differently from the way you do, you can't discuss it with them.

This is not particularly worrisome in basic arithmetic, but severely limits history, philosophy, and arts.