←back to thread

134 points salutis | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
nomilk ◴[] No.45135766[source]
The choice citizens have now is between an 'internet licence' (submit ID's to myriad sites), or an 'internet tax' (VPN).

Super annoying!

Given Australia doesn't even require Age Verification on porn sites (only on social media sites), the incentives hint this was strongly supported by legacy media (90% of Aussie media is owned by two companies, Newscorp and Nine Entertainment).

The internet licence will make it difficult for both authors and readers on alternative media platforms. And it will outright prohibit young people from getting information from non-permitted sources (of course, legacy sources are not affected - incidentally, they're probably more harmful than the prohibited sources). (I've long said, to try to think clearly after watching 'the news' is akin to trying to operate heavy machinery after consuming alcohol).

replies(8): >>45135790 #>>45135801 #>>45135814 #>>45135959 #>>45136108 #>>45136314 #>>45136947 #>>45137651 #
general1465 ◴[] No.45135959[source]
> Given Australia doesn't even require Age Verification on porn sites (only on social media sites)

Am I only one who sees loophole in creating a social media site, which will be a porn site first? FaceHub or Pornbook.

replies(3): >>45136023 #>>45136190 #>>45146475 #
1. blitzar ◴[] No.45136023[source]
It's called X.
replies(2): >>45136152 #>>45142522 #
2. nomilk ◴[] No.45136152[source]
X is one of the prohibited sites for under 16's in Australia (falls under 'social media'), but someone should seriously tell Elon about this, because it may work and would be hilarious.
3. 01HNNWZ0MV43FF ◴[] No.45142522[source]
How am I going to find cisgender porn on there though