←back to thread

What Is the Fourier Transform?

(www.quantamagazine.org)
474 points rbanffy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
abetusk ◴[] No.45134657[source]
I have a pet theory that the reason why the FT, and other transforms (generating functions, Mellin/Laplace/Legendre/Haar), are so useful is because many real world functions are sparse and lend themselves to compressed sensing.

The FT, as are many other transforms, are 1-1, so, in theory, there's no information lost or gained. In many real world conditions, looking at a function in frequency space greatly reduces the problem. Why? Pet theory: because many functions that look complex are actually composed of simpler building in the transformed space.

Take the sound wave of a fly and it looks horribly complex. Pump it through the FT and you find a main driver of the wings beating at a single frequency. Take the sum of two sine waves and it looks a mess. Take the FT and you see the signal neatly broken into two peaks. Etc.

The use of the FT (or DCT or whatever) for JPEG, MP3 or the like, is basically exploiting this fact by noticing the signal response for human hearing and seeing it's not uniform, and so can be "compressed" by throwing away frequencies we don't care about.

The "magic" of the FT, and other transforms, isn't so much that it transforms the signal into a set of orthogonal basis but that many signals we care about are actually formed from a small set of these signals, allowing the FT and cousins to notice and separate them out more easily.

replies(3): >>45134843 #>>45134906 #>>45137615 #
mitthrowaway2 ◴[] No.45134843[source]
As mentioned by other commenters, a reason for the FT's dominance in particular is because sine, cosine, and complex exponentials are the eigenfunctions of the derivative operator. Since so many real-world systems are governed by differential equations, the Fourier Transform becomes a natural lens to analyze these systems. Sound waves are one (of many) examples.

And there's another good reason why so many real-world signals are sparse (as you say) in the FT domain in particular: because so many real-world systems involve periodic motion (rotating motors, fly's wings as you noted, etc). When the system is periodic, the FT will compress the signals very effectively because every signal has to be harmonic of the fundamental frequency.

replies(1): >>45134947 #
abdullahkhalids ◴[] No.45134947[source]
The question is why "so many real-world systems are governed by differential equations" and "so many real-world systems involve periodic motion".

Well, stable systems are can either be stationary or oscillatory. If the world didn't contain so many stable systems, or equivalently if the laws of physics didn't allow so, then likely life would not have existed. All life is complex chemical structures, and they require stability to function. Ergo, by this anthropic argument there must be many oscillatory systems.

replies(5): >>45135073 #>>45135173 #>>45135443 #>>45135486 #>>45136287 #
1. cycomanic ◴[] No.45135073[source]
> The question is why "so many real-world systems are governed by differential equations" and "so many real-world systems involve periodic motion". > > Well, stable systems are can either be stationary or oscillatory. If the world didn't contain so many stable systems, or equivalently if the laws of physics didn't allow so, then likely life would not have existed. All life is complex chemical structures, and they require stability to function. Ergo, by this anthropic argument there must be many oscillatory systems.

I would say that the it's very difficult to imagine a world that would not be governed by differential equations. So it's not just that life wouldn't exist it's that there wouldn't be anything like the laws of physics.

As a side note chaotic systems are often better analysed in the FT domain, so even in a world of chaotic systems (and there are many in our world, and I'd argue that if there wasn't life would not exist either) the FT remains a powerful tool