Inverting the Xorshift128 random number generator

Xorshift128+ is not a cryptographic rng though, so at least this isn't a cryptographic attack...

Should programming languages use cryptographic rngs like a ChaCha20 based one in their standard libraries to stop accidental use of non cryptographic rngs for cryptographic purposes? But that comes at the cost of speed

I think some naming conventions could go a long way. If you want to import `fast_unsafe_random`, you might think twice.