←back to thread

Wikipedia survives while the rest of the internet breaks

(www.theverge.com)
598 points leotravis10 | 2 comments | 04 Sep 25 15:30 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jfengel ◴[05 Sep 25 02:34 UTC] No.45134481[source]▶
I was surprised that Wikipedia wasn't immediately overrun by trolls, griefers, and spammers. I'm still not entirely sure how it avoids that, though I've got some speculations.

Unlike most user contributed sites it's happy to throw stuff away. It does grow but it doesn't care about growing fast. That's great but it's a hard formula to replicate.

replies(3): >>45134527 #>>45134870 #>>45138503 #
1. rafram ◴[05 Sep 25 04:01 UTC] No.45134870[source]▶
Because contributions from new users are immediately reviewed by legions of volunteer cops who are eager to revert vandalism, and most wannabe vandals don’t have the sense to make a couple legitimate edits before vandalizing.
replies(1): >>45139781 #
2. jfengel ◴[05 Sep 25 15:35 UTC] No.45139781[source]▶
Can you imagine any other crowdsourced site who was willing to subject new users to so much scrutiny, and err on the side of deleting contributions?

Certainly that's not a great way to make money. Not if you're depending on people to spend a lot of time seeking new content (and be shown ads).