←back to thread

520 points kevinyew | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Shank ◴[] No.45126819[source]
I would've actually expected a buyer like OpenAI or Anthropic, if I'm being perfectly honest. Atlassian is such a strange buyer. $610m in cash is really low in the grand scheme of AI pricing too. If they're only worth $610m, I feel like this says a lot that "AI browsers" aren't actually worth that much. Remember, Instagram was $1b. The Windsurf acquihire was $2.4b and there are surely a lot more people in business that use browsers than write code.

Was Atlassian the highest bidder, or was Atlassian the only bidder?

replies(4): >>45126997 #>>45127512 #>>45127956 #>>45132867 #
k9294 ◴[] No.45127512[source]
It looks really overpriced to me. Dia is a rough MVP. Arc is really a very niche browser with little adoption. I dont think technology worth this money, and Arc the user base is low compared to major browsers, probably around 1-5 million users with no growth (most likely they hit the plateau even before they decide to kill the Arc in favor of Dia).
replies(1): >>45130926 #
tripletpeaks ◴[] No.45130926[source]
This is the first I’m hearing of either of these products, or this company. If you’d asked me what a program named Dia was ten minutes ago, I’d have confidently replied that it’s an open source gui diagramming tool.
replies(2): >>45134103 #>>45134265 #
1. democracy ◴[] No.45134103[source]
Same, and I don't not really wanna try:

"A new AI browser from the makers of Arc: Chat with your tabs"

say what??? )))