←back to thread

598 points leotravis10 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Whoppertime ◴[] No.45132149[source]
Wikipedia is a good source for certain kinds of information. If you ask it about anything political it's going to be from a certain slant and the most informative part of the page will be the Talk page which explains what people would like on the page that isn't there, or shouldn't be on the page but is
replies(7): >>45132192 #>>45132209 #>>45132221 #>>45135506 #>>45137668 #>>45140158 #>>45148207 #
stopthebullshit[dead post] ◴[] No.45132221[source]
[flagged]
1. noman-land ◴[] No.45133070[source]
Got any notable examples? All the history is publc so it should be easy to link to, presumably.
replies(1): >>45134208 #
2. adzm ◴[] No.45134208[source]
People say this about political topics on Wikipedia often but rarely if ever provide examples.
replies(1): >>45134533 #
3. idle_zealot ◴[] No.45134533[source]
Another case of the well-documented left-wing bias of reality.