←back to thread

598 points leotravis10 | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.69s | source
Show context
hungmung ◴[] No.45129383[source]
Honestly Wikipedia+Archive.org remaining online have national security implications (not just USA, but any democracy). Though I'd wager the current administration would take a different view.
replies(5): >>45130138 #>>45130654 #>>45132061 #>>45134570 #>>45138383 #
1. jacobgkau ◴[] No.45132061[source]
> national security implications (not just USA, but any democracy)

That's not really "national," is it?

replies(1): >>45133119 #
2. hungmung ◴[] No.45133119[source]
National security doesn't just refer to USA...?

France has national security considerations, just like the UK, Uruguay and Uganda. They'd all benefit from having open access to verifiable information.

replies(1): >>45140208 #
3. jacobgkau ◴[] No.45140208[source]
That's fine, it just seems more like a "societal security consideration," "democratic consideration," or just a general "consideration" than specifically "national security," which has the scope of a nation.