←back to thread

222 points dougb5 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
frollogaston ◴[] No.45123055[source]
Maybe they can allow AI for writing but raise the bar on quality so the blind copy-paste submissions still fail. I've still never read a good AI-generated doc at work, it's always verbose and aimless. At this point I close the doc if I catch a whiff. Unlike the AI code which is fine.

It's probably either that or ban it and do everything in-person, which might have to be the stopgap solution.

replies(2): >>45123187 #>>45127554 #
like_any_other ◴[] No.45123187[source]
> Maybe they can allow AI for writing but raise the bar on quality so the blind copy-paste submissions still fail.

These are highschoolers, still learning to write - their output won't be the best. It won't be long at all until AI can write as well as the average (honest, pre-AI) highschooler, if we're not past that point already.

replies(2): >>45123361 #>>45131988 #
1. dghlsakjg ◴[] No.45131988[source]
You have severely overestimated most high-school students.

The whole reason that this is an issue is that LLMs have been able to match or beat student output since chatGPT 3.5.