←back to thread

156 points xbmcuser | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Jcampuzano2 ◴[] No.45127075[source]
Clear example of privatization of everything... until its the big corporations who need to get something done - then its socialism in disguise. And of course they hide all the deals behind closed doors so their customers can't see who all, and how much they're subsidizing.

If there is a sudden increase in demand/supply issues due to large corporations they should be the ones to subsidize the bill. I'd argue in the communities this affects they should be forced to cover for everyone who lives in the area for materially making their lives worse.

Not to mention utility companies should be forced to be transparent in the pricing/deals they make with tech companies. They are likely just luring them in with a deal and passing off the rest to their customers so they still don't lose out in the short term. They want the best of both worlds - still making all the same profits short term by passing on to customers while getting the long term lock-in for these data centers.

replies(3): >>45127139 #>>45127376 #>>45127569 #
OtherShrezzing ◴[] No.45127139[source]
>should be the ones to subsidize the bill

Clarity on the wording here. They should be the ones _paying_ the bill, not subsidising it. It's not subsidising if they're the consumer of the marginal product.

replies(1): >>45127300 #
jeffbee ◴[] No.45127300[source]
If an industrial customer pays for the entire power plant, but then also has to outbid everyone in 13 states to access the energy it paid for, then the industrial customer has clearly subsidized it.
replies(1): >>45131686 #
1. croon ◴[] No.45131686[source]
They can build a dedicated plant off-grid, or BTM.