←back to thread

222 points dougb5 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
zdragnar ◴[] No.45123041[source]
I recently found out that my nephew's school had no take-home homework before high school, instead having kids complete assignments during class time. At first, I was flabbergasted that they would deny kids the discipline building of managing unstructured time without direct supervision. Homework- at home- seemed like such a fundamental part of the schooling experience.

Now, I'm thinking that was pretty much they only way they could think of to ensure kids were doing things themselves.

I know it was a rough transition for my nephew, though, and I don't know that I would have handled it very well either. I'm not sure what would be a better option, though, given how much of a disservice such easy access to a mental crutch is.

replies(16): >>45123086 #>>45123338 #>>45124878 #>>45125951 #>>45126242 #>>45126802 #>>45130765 #>>45130818 #>>45130939 #>>45131401 #>>45131416 #>>45131798 #>>45132056 #>>45132172 #>>45132257 #>>45134842 #
xboxnolifes ◴[] No.45123338[source]
Reverse classrooms (take home lectures/readings with in-class exercises) aren't that new of a concept. The idea is that instead of valuable classroom time being spent on a teacher spending most of the class time lecturing, they can spend more time working with students on hands-on work.

I personally had some teachers apply this 10 or so years ago, and I assume the idea existed prior to them. Though, I'm not sure exactly what age range this would work best with.

replies(2): >>45126667 #>>45129124 #
1. HDThoreaun ◴[] No.45129124[source]
The problem with this strategy is that tons of kids just wont do the reading which derails the entire class period.