←back to thread

397 points Anon84 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
baalimago ◴[] No.45126101[source]
Strongest argument I see for Mistral is that it's European. Which isn't a very good argument.
replies(6): >>45126165 #>>45126178 #>>45126226 #>>45126584 #>>45126709 #>>45126780 #
mkreis ◴[] No.45126178[source]
It is in regards to the GDPR. If you're a European vendor and process PII, you must ensure some level of data protection. If you want to be on the safe side, you'll pick European providers instead of US hyperscalers (who have EU data centers, but are still US owned).
replies(2): >>45126317 #>>45126434 #
apwell23 ◴[] No.45126317[source]
how does the 'memory' feature in mistral work wrt GDPR if i type in my personal information ?
replies(1): >>45126387 #
dax_ ◴[] No.45126387[source]
GDPR doesn't stop personal data being stored. It handles whom it can be shared with, when it has to be deleted, and only collect as much data as required. Also gives transparency to the users about their data use.

And if I were to give over personal information to an AI company, then absolutely I'll prefer a company who actually complies with GDPR.

replies(1): >>45126454 #
apwell23 ◴[] No.45126454[source]
yea i mean. how would they know how to remove it from 'memory' since they have no way to know with 100% accuracy which parts of my chart are PII.
replies(2): >>45126652 #>>45126723 #
1. rsynnott ◴[] No.45126723[source]
The cautious approach on their part would be to just delete the whole thing on any subject access deletion request.
replies(1): >>45138544 #
2. apwell23 ◴[] No.45138544[source]
yes if they aren't using that to train