←back to thread

677 points meetpateltech | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.267s | source
Show context
Syzygies ◴[] No.45125257[source]
This interests me but they don't address practical Claude Code Opus 4.1 use at scale.

I have a $200/month Anthropic Max subscription that I use for help in exploring and coding my math research. As of now no AI model can compete with Opus 4.1 for helping me with my most challenging tasks. I try every one I can. Gemini 2.5 Pro is great for code review and a second opinion, but drives off the road when it takes the wheel.

I tried a $100/monthly plan and spent $20 in an hour the first time I went over; an API key is not a practical way to use Opus 4.1.

There are plenty of concerns using Clause Code in a terminal, that Zed could address. Mainly, I can't "see over AI's shoulder" so I need to also test. The most careful extension I coded was terminal sessions we could share as equal participants. Nevertheless, as a rule I'd attribute my relative success to just living with shortcomings, as if a "partner that snores". AI loses track of the current directory all the time, or forgets my variable naming and comment conventions? Just keep going, fix it later.

How can I get equivalent value to my Max plan, using Claude Code Opus 4.1 with Zed?

replies(3): >>45125301 #>>45125410 #>>45125460 #
1. faangguyindia ◴[] No.45125410[source]
>h Opus 4.1 for helping me with my most challenging tasks

I switched to gemini 2.5 pro, after some prompt tweaking nothing really beats in actual coding tasks imho.