←back to thread

548 points kmelve | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.745s | source
Show context
nikcub ◴[] No.45110364[source]
> budget for $1000-1500/month for a senior engineer going all-in on AI development.

Is this another case of someone using API keys and not knowing about the claude MAX plans? It's $100 or $200 a month, if you're not pure yolo brute-force vibe coding $100 plan works.

https://www.anthropic.com/max

replies(3): >>45111294 #>>45112897 #>>45116057 #
vincent_builds ◴[] No.45116057[source]
Author here, quick clarification on pricing: the $1000-1500/month is for Teams/Enterprise with higher rate limits, not the consumer MAX plans. Consumer MAX ($200/month) works for lighter usage but hits limits quickly with parallel agents and large codebases.

For context: that's 1-2% of a senior engineer's fully loaded cost. The ROI is clear if it delivers even 10% productivity gain (we're seeing 2-3x on specific tasks).

You're right that many devs can start with MAX plans. The higher tier becomes necessary when running multiple parallel contexts and doing systematic exploration (the "3-attempt pattern" burns tokens fast).

I wouldn't be doing it if I didn't think it was value for money. I've always been a cost-conscious engineer who weighs cost/value, and with Claude, I am seeing the return.

replies(1): >>45124616 #
1. imron ◴[] No.45124616[source]
> The ROI is clear if it delivers even 10% productivity gain

What if what feels like a productivity gain is actually a productivity loss?

https://mikelovesrobots.substack.com/p/wheres-the-shovelware...

(see link in the article to a study showing developers thought AI gave them a 20% gain in productivity, but measuring this showed they instead had a 20% loss)