←back to thread

222 points dougb5 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.021s | source
Show context
textadventure ◴[] No.45123198[source]
This take from a Hermione-type High School senior shed next to zero new light on the subject. Yes, we know AI is redefining school and jobs and daily life. The perspective of an obnoxious A+ type student isn't helping, especially because you kind of can read between the lines that she isn't friends with these kids using AI, which would give her a deeper perspective of why and how they are using AI.

Is this what The Atlantic has come down to, publishing a complain-y piece by the class president?

EDIT: For anyone struggling with my criticism of the article, I very much agree that there is a problem of AI in education. Her suggestion which is "maybe more oral exams and less essays?" I'm sure has never been considered by teachers around the world rolls eyes.

As for how to tackle this, I think the only solution is accept the fact that AI is going nowhere and integrate it into the class. Show kids in the class how to use AI properly, compare what different AI models say, and compare what they say to what scholars and authors have written, to what kids in the past have written in their essays.

You don't have to fight AI to instill critical thinking in kids. You can embrace it to teach them its limitations.

replies(5): >>45123232 #>>45123255 #>>45123256 #>>45123272 #>>45131372 #
bdangubic[dead post] ◴[] No.45123232[source]
[flagged]
textadventure ◴[] No.45123265[source]
ANY real kid that is unpretentious would do. A "I use AI to cheat at school" article would be far more interesting that this "Oh my God, my peers are hopeless but not me" piece.
replies(3): >>45123304 #>>45123974 #>>45132144 #
add-sub-mul-div ◴[] No.45123304[source]
If you're judging without even knowing the content of the hypothetical alternative then is the difference just that one premise offends you while the other supports you?
replies(1): >>45123352 #
1. textadventure ◴[] No.45123352[source]
Huh? I'm questioning the point of this pretentious article, that's all.
replies(1): >>45125841 #
2. bdangubic ◴[] No.45125841[source]
the only pretentious thing here was your original comment :)