←back to thread

Claude Code: Now in Beta in Zed

(zed.dev)
677 points meetpateltech | 1 comments | 03 Sep 25 15:07 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ppeetteerr ◴[03 Sep 25 17:35 UTC] No.45118464[source]▶
I love Zed and I'm glad you now have native support for Claude. I previously ran it using the instructions in this post: https://benswift.me/blog/2025/07/23/running-claude-code-with...

One thing that still suffers is AI autocomplete. While I tried Zed's own solution and supermaven (now part of Cursor), I still find Cursor's AI autocomplete and predictions much more accurate (even pulling up a file via search is more accurate in Cursor).

I am glad to hear that Zed got a round of funding. https://zed.dev/blog/sequoia-backs-zed This will go a long way to creating real competition to Cursor in the form of a quality IDE not built on VSCode

replies(9): >>45118738 #>>45118799 #>>45119067 #>>45119080 #>>45120139 #>>45120380 #>>45121210 #>>45121710 #>>45126045 #
cnqso ◴[03 Sep 25 18:09 UTC] No.45118799[source]▶
What Zed lacks in code generation quality it makes up for in not-being-an-Electron-app
replies(6): >>45118850 #>>45119433 #>>45119652 #>>45119863 #>>45121653 #>>45123340 #
1. diss ◴[03 Sep 25 23:46 UTC] No.45121653[source]▶
This is simply not true… that’s the problem. As much as I like Zed, using it for the sake of not being an electron app doesn’t make any sense when Cursor’s edit prediction adds so much value. I’m not starved of resources and can run Cursor just fine – as far as Electron apps go VS Code is great, performant enough. I value productivity. I’ll very happily drop Cursor for Zed the second edit prediction is comparable. I’m eagerly waiting.