←back to thread

Claude Code: Now in Beta in Zed

(zed.dev)
677 points meetpateltech | 3 comments | 03 Sep 25 15:07 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ppeetteerr ◴[03 Sep 25 17:35 UTC] No.45118464[source]▶
I love Zed and I'm glad you now have native support for Claude. I previously ran it using the instructions in this post: https://benswift.me/blog/2025/07/23/running-claude-code-with...

One thing that still suffers is AI autocomplete. While I tried Zed's own solution and supermaven (now part of Cursor), I still find Cursor's AI autocomplete and predictions much more accurate (even pulling up a file via search is more accurate in Cursor).

I am glad to hear that Zed got a round of funding. https://zed.dev/blog/sequoia-backs-zed This will go a long way to creating real competition to Cursor in the form of a quality IDE not built on VSCode

replies(9): >>45118738 #>>45118799 #>>45119067 #>>45119080 #>>45120139 #>>45120380 #>>45121210 #>>45121710 #>>45126045 #
scottcorgan ◴[03 Sep 25 18:37 UTC] No.45119067[source]▶
I'll third this. AI autocomplete is THE most efficient and helpful feature of Cursor, not the agents.
replies(5): >>45120577 #>>45120806 #>>45122731 #>>45124860 #>>45125155 #
1. danenania ◴[03 Sep 25 21:25 UTC] No.45120577[source]▶
Same sentiment for me. I barely use the agent, but love their autocomplete. Though I sometimes hear people say that GH Copilot has largely caught up on this front. Can anyone speak to that? I haven’t compared them recently.

If performance were equal, I’d strongly consider going back to GH Copilot just because I don’t love my main IDE being a fork. I occasionally encounter IDE-level bugs in Cursor that are unrelated to the AI features. Perhaps they’re in the upstream as well, but I always wonder if a. there will be a delay in merging fixes or b. whether the fork is introducing new bugs. Just an inherent tradeoff I guess of forking a complex codebase.

replies(1): >>45121171 #
2. debian3 ◴[03 Sep 25 22:43 UTC] No.45121171[source]▶
They haven’t. They had time to catch up, but they didn’t. They recently switched their auto complete model from 4o-mini to 4.1-mini. It’s not smarter at predicting what you are trying to do. Nothing magical like last year experience on Cursor (I haven’t tested lately, so it might be even better now).

I heard Windsurf is quite good and the closest to Cursor magic, available on Windsurf free plan (unlimited autocomplete). I should give that a try.

replies(1): >>45122428 #
3. dcreater ◴[04 Sep 25 01:30 UTC] No.45122428[source]▶
They plan to allow defining your own endpoint for auto-complete soon and when they do switching to a better model like Sonnet or a fine tune should beat Cursor