←back to thread

170 points PaulHoule | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
dcre ◴[] No.45119904[source]
Always fun to see a theoretical argument that something clearly already happening is impossible.
replies(2): >>45120040 #>>45120369 #
ahartmetz ◴[] No.45120040[source]
So where are the recent improvements in LLMs proportional to the billions invested?
replies(1): >>45120367 #
1. dcre ◴[] No.45120367[source]
Value for the money is not at issue in the paper!
replies(2): >>45120399 #>>45120659 #
2. ahartmetz ◴[] No.45120399[source]
I believe it is. They are saying that LLMs don't improve all that much from giving them more resources - and computing power (and input corpus size) is pretty proportional to money.
3. 42lux ◴[] No.45120659[source]
It's not about value it's about the stagnation while throwing compute at the problem.
replies(1): >>45120725 #
4. dcre ◴[] No.45120725[source]
Exactly.