←back to thread

186 points nserrino | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.004s | source
Show context
nikolayasdf123 ◴[] No.45119495[source]
> non 100% correctness of kernels

wouldn't model not work properly if kernels are even slightly off?

wasn't kernels a part of training stack for models? am I missing anything?

replies(2): >>45119795 #>>45120966 #
1. ymsodev ◴[] No.45119795[source]
The article is referring to GPU compute kernel (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compute_kernel), not the term kernel used in ML/NN/etc.
replies(1): >>45124876 #
2. saagarjha ◴[] No.45124876[source]
…aren't they the same thing
replies(1): >>45143386 #
3. ymsodev ◴[] No.45143386[source]
They're not, but I also misunderstood the original question, they're referring to the correct definition of kernel. I thought they were confusing the GPU kernel with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernel_method or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernel_(image_processing)