←back to thread

69 points thunderbong | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.198s | source
Show context
wg0 ◴[] No.45110245[source]
Why in the world I would buy a phone (any not just Google) that costs north of $800 is beyond me unless I want to signal my purchasing power. If utility is my metric and not outward signalling and flex, I find this worst deployment of my funds.

So called "budget" phones these days have OLED screens some even come with 120Hz displays (beyond me why someone would want that) and plenty of compute and memory.

You want camera, buy a camera. You want gaming, buy a console or gaming machine.

replies(7): >>45110265 #>>45110269 #>>45110274 #>>45110337 #>>45110393 #>>45110621 #>>45119925 #
xnx ◴[] No.45110337[source]
$800 sounds like a lot, but is very reasonable for a device someone might use 3+ hours a day for 2 years. At the end of those years, it can likely be sold for at least $400. That works out to something like $0.36/hour.
replies(1): >>45110463 #
raincole ◴[] No.45110463[source]
It's an extremely weird way to look at price. My family use the same dining table for more than two decades. So it's about 5,000 ~ 10,000 hours. But it doesn't make it somehow worth a few thousands of bucks.
replies(2): >>45110766 #>>45119322 #
1. lotsofpulp ◴[] No.45119322[source]
The price comparison should be to other phones (presumption is you are definitely buying one).

Then, the question is if phone A costs $0.25 per hour, and phone B costs $0.36 per hour, are you willing to spend an extra $0.11 per hour.

The same applies to the dining table, but obviously the comparison is to other dining tables.