←back to thread

Claude Code: Now in Beta in Zed

(zed.dev)
677 points meetpateltech | 2 comments | 03 Sep 25 15:07 UTC | HN request time: 0.003s | source
Show context
ppeetteerr ◴[03 Sep 25 17:35 UTC] No.45118464[source]▶
I love Zed and I'm glad you now have native support for Claude. I previously ran it using the instructions in this post: https://benswift.me/blog/2025/07/23/running-claude-code-with...

One thing that still suffers is AI autocomplete. While I tried Zed's own solution and supermaven (now part of Cursor), I still find Cursor's AI autocomplete and predictions much more accurate (even pulling up a file via search is more accurate in Cursor).

I am glad to hear that Zed got a round of funding. https://zed.dev/blog/sequoia-backs-zed This will go a long way to creating real competition to Cursor in the form of a quality IDE not built on VSCode

replies(9): >>45118738 #>>45118799 #>>45119067 #>>45119080 #>>45120139 #>>45120380 #>>45121210 #>>45121710 #>>45126045 #
cnqso ◴[03 Sep 25 18:09 UTC] No.45118799[source]▶
What Zed lacks in code generation quality it makes up for in not-being-an-Electron-app
replies(6): >>45118850 #>>45119433 #>>45119652 #>>45119863 #>>45121653 #>>45123340 #
shreddit ◴[03 Sep 25 18:15 UTC] No.45118850[source]▶
Does it really? At the end of the day i need it to do my job. Ideal values don’t help me doing my job. So i choose the editor best suited and the features i need. And that’s not zed at the moment.
replies(2): >>45118997 #>>45119472 #
1. mikepurvis ◴[03 Sep 25 18:31 UTC] No.45118997[source]▶
There's an analogue here with programming language iteration— Python, Ruby and friends showed what the semantics were that were needed, and then a decade or two later, Go and Rust took those semantics and put them in compiled, performance-oriented languages.

Electron has been a powerful tool for quickly iterating UIs and plugin architectures in VSCode, Brackets, Atom, etc, now the window is open for a modern editor to deliver that experience without the massive memory footprint and UI stalls.

replies(1): >>45119266 #
2. ◴[03 Sep 25 18:57 UTC] No.45119266[source]▶