←back to thread

How to Give a Good Talk

(blog.sigplan.org)
271 points pykello | 7 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
ehutch79 ◴[] No.45116982[source]
Ugh, I watch a lot of conference videos, I have more donts than dos. Things that make me turn off a video.

- Yes, tell me who you are, and why i should listen to you. But keep it to 1 slide, and 1 minute. I shouldn't be able to walk away and come back literal 5 minutes later and have you still yammering about yourself. especially for a 15 minute lightening talk.

- Your talk title should be the agenda. I do NOT need a slide by slide table of contents for your talk, or you reading out the table of contents.

- Accents, even heavy ones, aren't much of a problem. Looking anxious isn't a problem, i feel you there. However, You mumbling is. Being overly monotone is. Looking bored yourself doesn't help. People are there because they _know_ you have something their interested to say, you can be confident that people will listen.

- Get to the point. Seriously. I shouldn't be able to scrub ahead 10+ minutes and not have you talking about the topic at hand. Please don't explain the basics, like what a web browser is, when your audience is a web dev conference.

-Cut the fluff. Especially if you're adhd or other neuro diverse, you need to work to stay on topic. It _might_ help if you write a script, and have someone go through and mark anything off topic. Even if you don't use the script on stage, writing it and having it might anchor you to the topic at hand.

You don't need to be perfect on stage. We'll all forgive a lot that happens in a talk. We've all experienced the wrath of the demo gods. We get it, you're cool. BUT only if you're actually giving your talk. Note that most of my complaints circle around not actually giving your talk while you're on stage.

replies(4): >>45117133 #>>45117756 #>>45118428 #>>45120184 #
monocasa ◴[] No.45117133[source]
> Cut the fluff. Especially if you're adhd or other neuro diverse, you need to work to stay on topic. It _might_ help if you write a script, and have someone go through and mark anything off topic. Even if you don't use the script on stage, writing it and having it might anchor you to the topic at hand.

This one depends. I agree with you probably 4 out of 5 times it happens, but that other 20% are probably some of the best, most memorable talks.

replies(1): >>45117823 #
1. sharkjacobs ◴[] No.45117823[source]
I don't know of any examples which match what you're describing, except for some things which were captivating train wrecks, and I don't think they accomplished what the speaker was trying to do very well.

Do you have any examples you could link to, or were they all live events?

replies(3): >>45119061 #>>45119315 #>>45121411 #
2. jamesblonde ◴[] No.45119061[source]
James Mickens - amazing speaker. Check this one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajGX7odA87k

3. butlike ◴[] No.45119315[source]
Jacob Thorton - Cascading Shit Show might fit the bill
4. wilkystyle ◴[] No.45121411[source]
Bryan Cantrill's Oracle rant:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=-zRN7XLCRhc&t=33m1s

replies(1): >>45123482 #
5. xmprt ◴[] No.45123482[source]
I don't see fluff there. Every sentence was pointed and served a purpose.
replies(1): >>45123915 #
6. tibbar ◴[] No.45123915{3}[source]
It's an amazing rant, but he's still going off on tangents: what is worthwhile in life? And how horrible is Oracle? No really, let's just ROAST oracle. Wait that reminds us of Larry Ellison. He really is the worst, have you heard these stories?! Don't anthropmorphize him, he's a lawnmower!

If you look at the single slide that all of this is sparked by, you can see that these are just (amazing) rants. He's telling the story of Illumos, and that reminds him of the pure evil of Oracle and the meaning of life, and he keeps letting himself drift from the topic to savor those points over and over. He is very quirky, and thinks about things in very quirky ways, and he's just letting the whole audience enjoy that for a bit.

That's why this is such a great illustration of OP's point.

replies(1): >>45133234 #
7. xmprt ◴[] No.45133234{4}[source]
I'm looking at those tangents as part of the scope of the talk. When you're talking about someone's unique perspective of the history of some event, you want all those opinions and rants in there. If it was just a list of slides talking going from event to event, that'd be extremely boring.