←back to thread

Anthropic raises $13B Series F

(www.anthropic.com)
585 points meetpateltech | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ankit219 ◴[] No.45105422[source]
Their projections for ARR at the end of this year at a high of $9B[1] at the end of this year. And reported gross margins of 60% (-30% with cloud providers partnerships). All things considered, if this pans out, it's a 20x multiple. High yes, but not that crazy. Specially considering their growth rate and that too at a decent margin at gm level.

[1]: It was $3B at the end of May (so likely $250M in May alone), and $5B at end of july (so $400M that month).

replies(3): >>45106080 #>>45110501 #>>45111948 #
tootie ◴[] No.45111948[source]
Margins of 60%? On inference maybe but that disappears when you price in model training.

This guy's analysis says they are bleeding out despite massive revenue

https://www.wheresyoured.at/anthropic-is-bleeding-out/

replies(1): >>45112080 #
ankit219 ◴[] No.45112080[source]
In Jan, when deepseek launched, Dario Amodei had to disclose they spent about $10M to train the last generation of models (his arguments was deepseek was on the curve, not breaking it).

They earned $250M in May based on ARR, and about $400M in july. Model training is going to be amortized over multiple years anyway. I am not privy to how much they spent, not going to comment on that. GM was public news, and hence I got that.

Re Zitron's analysis, I don't find them to be reliable or compelling.

replies(2): >>45112776 #>>45112789 #
1. kgwgk ◴[] No.45112776{3}[source]
> Model training is going to be amortized over multiple years anyway.

Claude 4 launch was not even fifteen months after the launch of Claude 3 (which is discontinued). The “multiple” is 1.2 - I wouldn’t call that “multiple years”.