←back to thread

191 points foxfired | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jjk166 ◴[] No.45111258[source]
I have interviewed many people. I have never once been impressed by someone figuring out a convoluted way to force a round peg into a square hole. The people I recommend are the ones who question why I would want to do something. If need be, I can always follow up with "but what if you had to do it this way." But for a question meant to evaluate technical ability, I am going to ask you how to do something which is a best practice. If I'm asking you how you would solve an absurd problem, the purpose of the question is to evaluate how you approach problems, and I will let you know that's the purpose of the inquiry.
replies(2): >>45111352 #>>45121106 #
ajmurmann ◴[] No.45111352[source]
I'm with you on this as an interviewer but as an interviewee have had interviewers who clearly didn't like it when I did this or even started to get impatient when I called out different problems than they cared about. There is a really terrible feedback loop around interview expectations.
replies(1): >>45112732 #
1. hinkley ◴[] No.45112732[source]
The worst question I've been asked recently was how to make something robust.

When I started running down the laundry list of footguns with the basic solution, he clearly became impatient. I never did figure out what he was after, but I worry for the team.