←back to thread

293 points giuliomagnifico | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
shayway ◴[] No.45108426[source]
> Amazon argued that the class was too large to be manageable

Sorry, we've wronged too many people to be held accountable! What a wild argument.

replies(9): >>45108604 #>>45108647 #>>45109746 #>>45110618 #>>45111025 #>>45111655 #>>45111976 #>>45112486 #>>45125926 #
p1necone ◴[] No.45108647[source]
Unfortunately this approach seems to fly all the time for large businesses.

Plucky startup takes the 'ask forgiveness rather than permission' approach and ignores a bunch of regulations, legal system doesn't care because they're just a plucky startup.

10 or so years later plucky startup is a massive corpo, another 5 or so years later the legal system catches up but they're a massive corpo making piles of cash and the worst the legal system can do at that point is penalize them with the equivalent of pocket change compared to the piles of cash they made while ignoring those regulations.

replies(1): >>45108802 #
gruez ◴[] No.45108802[source]
>up but they're a massive corpo making piles of cash and the worst the legal system can do at that point is penalize them with the equivalent of pocket change compared to the piles of cash they made while ignoring those regulations.

Examples? Usually when I see this argument being brought up, it's usually something like "[multinational megacorp] fined $x for breaking Belgian privacy laws", and then people pile in saying how "$x is 1% of [multinational megacorp]'s turnover" and therefore the fine is just "a cost of doing business", but neglecting to account for how much % of their revenue is in Belgium, or how much money they could have plausibly gained from the offenses in question.

replies(5): >>45108927 #>>45108972 #>>45109411 #>>45110794 #>>45112413 #
1. mystraline ◴[] No.45112413[source]
> Examples

Ubercab. Later sued and changed to Uber.

Now, too big to fail.

Basically is illegal unlicensed uninsured scam cab company.